RSS Feed

Author Archives: megancastellan

Love and Fire

So a few things:

I really did preach in between these two sermons.  But I used notes, and they don’t make a whole lot of sense outside of my head.  Sorry.

I have to thank Deirdre Good, my NT prof from seminary, for this reading of the centurion’s slave story.  I really like her exegesis of it, and so did my parish.  In fact, a couple that’s getting married in October asked to use this gospel at their wedding after this sermon.  Awwwwww.  🙂

Rev. Megan L. Castellan

May 29, 2016

Ordinary Time, Proper 3

2 Kings, Luke

 

I spent the last few days in Las Vegas for a friend’s birthday.  (I realize that this sounds like the start of a joke–priest walks into a casino! But it’s true)  Every evening, we noticed that there was one guy who would place himself on a corner of the Strip with a ginormous cross, and yell at people through a megaphone.  

All the normal stuff–we were all sinners, all going to hell, all in need of a personal relationship with Christ, etc etc.  He was a blast.  

What was interesting about him, was not only his dedication to his shouting, but how ineffective he was at it.  No one stopped to talk to him.  No one paid any attention–the Strip in Vegas, after all, is where you can see pretty much every sort of person God created, wandering around in every sort of weird clothing choice available.  And a guy yelling in front of a giant cross really isn’t the oddest thing to see–especially when he is yelling about how horrible and condemned you all are.  That’s not a good conversation starter.  His method seemed really flawed–and on the last night, he changed his tune.  He yelled about how to preach the gospel was the greatest task one could engage in.  “Oh” I thought.  “This made sense.  He’s not actually out here for us.  He’s doing this for himself.”   

 

But for some reason, this Yelling! Form of evangelism has remained very popular.  Elijah himself pioneered it, as we see today.  Now–this is an awesome story, because Elijah is the original James Dean of biblical prophets.  He wanders around, annoying the king.  He summons bears out of the woods to carry off kids who make fun of his baldness.  Elijah is great–albeit not a nice guy.  And here is no different.  Israel is again struggling with whether or not to be faithful to God.  The king has married a foreign woman (Jezebel–she’ll earn her reputation in a bit).  And as a result, there’s a lot of political pressure to follow her religion, and not the religion of Israel.  This really isn’t new.  

So Elijah decides to combat this nonsense in flamboyant style–he yells at the opposing priests, taunts their non-existent god, then calls down fire from the sky to consume them.  Then, you can probably imagine him strutting off, really proud of himself, and all he accomplished.  Because, as we all know–nothing converts people to your cause like intimidation and genocide.  

 

And spoiler alert–worship of other gods continues to be a problem for Israel.  While showy, Elijah’s trick here doesn’t actually solve the problem.  (And remember–just because someone does A Thing in the Bible, does not mean God likes that Thing, or wants us to replicate it.)

We don’t get the resolution of this story until a few weeks from now.  

 

But I want to point something out. Mount Carmel is where the Elijah story happens–in the north of Galilee.  Capernaum is where the Jesus story happens.  They’re pretty close together.  And growing up in Nazareth, as a good Jewish kid, Jesus would have known this story of Elijah.  Would have gone to the Mountain where it happened.  Would have maybe wrestled with what Elijah did in the name of God.

 

So it’s in that context that it’s helpful to look at the story from Luke.  Because on the surface, it’s not so complicated–it looks like another healing story.  A Roman centurion has a slave that’s sick, and he wants him to be healed, so Jesus heals him.  No biggie–happens a lot.

 

But there are some weirdnesses about this story.  First of all, the Roman centurion–a high-ranking army official from the army that was occupying the town–first goes to the Jewish elders for help, and asks them to intercede for him.  He’s definitely not one of them–he’s not Jewish, he’s even part of foreign government sent to oppress the Jewish Israelites, yet he gets along well with the local population.

And also–it’s not usual for an army official to intercede for a slave like this.  The language he uses (in Greek) is pretty emphatic–this part about ‘a slave whom he valued highly’–literally, “who was precious to him”.  The centurion himself refers to the slave as “my boy” which makes it even more unusual.  Slaves were nice to have–but the way this guy fights for his is similar to how parents intercede for their children, or spouses intercede for each other, in other healing stories.  This makes some scholars believe that the centurion has a romantic relationship with the boy–which wouldn’t have been unusual in Greco-Roman culture…but would not have been so proper in nice Jewish culture.

 

And so, Jesus is basically talking to the sort of person that Elijah would have definitely burned to a crisp.  From most outward appearances, the centurion needs to get yelled at, if Jesus is an old-school prophet.

 

Yet, that’s not what he does.  Jesus talks to him.  Listens to what he has to say.  And instead of chastising him, or reminding him of how horrible he is–Jesus shows him mercy.  Jesus shows him love, and heals the boy.

 

Because, it turns out the centurion didn’t need convincing of his unworthiness.  He knew it already.  Getting a lesson in how wicked you are wasn’t what he needed–what he needed was someone to show him the love of God in that moment.  That had the power to transform his life.  

 

There is enough in the world that communicates how awful we are.  The world doesn’t need more of that.  The world doesn’t need more people screaming about how wretched we are.  What the world needs–what has the power to transform it–is each of us embodying the love of God for one another.  Not waiting for preconditions to be met, not insisting on a level of compliance or righteousness–but simply loving one another.

 

That changes the world.  That changes lives.  That’s what we’re called to do.

Amen.

Fear Itself

I’m not a fan of gender essentialism.  (Shock!) Whether it’s the toy aisle at Target or pronouncing salad to be ‘lady food’ (which, by the way, is still evidently an oft-told folktale in the Diocese of Southern Virginia.)   People are complex and different, and quite frankly, I have never found gender to be a very good predictor of much.

However, this doesn’t imply that denying women a voice in discussions doesn’t lead to certain myopias.  It’s not that letting one woman speak will give you a perspective on all women, everywhere.  (No, Mel Gibson–that’s not a thing.)  But it enlarges the discussion in important ways, due to the systemic ways women are treated in society.

All this is to say–the theological argument that pride is the original sin seems skewed to me.  That’s the argument of someone who has always been encouraged, either explicitly or implicitly, by the world to think well of themselves–and for groups who are told by the world that they are worthless, to argue against pride in any form becomes dangerous.

Here is where I politely remind you that theology always has real-world consequences, and we need to be conscious of them–lest the Good News of freedom we preach turn to oppression.

To that end….

Rev. Megan L. Castellan

March 20, 2016

Palm Sunday, Year C

Luke 23: 1-49

 

Theologians like to argue over weird stuff.  I have friends on Facebook who are full-time theologians, and they get into knock-down, drag out fights over atonement theories, about which old-time theologian was the best, about whether predestination is a thing.  
And they argue over what original sin is.  

Because they’re professional theologians, they are not content with just arguing whether original sin exists, or how it continues on–no, they must try to figure out which sin it is!  Now, most of Western Christianity has maintained that original sin is pride.  Augustine on forward thought that it was the pride of humans that caused the first Fall, back in the garden of Eden.  When Eve wanted to be like God, knowing Good and Evil, and she ate the apple–that was the problem.  Pride, and overzealous ambition.  And so pride trips us up ever since.

 

I am unconvinced.  While I think pride is a bad thing, and surely responsible for a lot of the problems in the world, I don’t think overzealous pride is a universal failing.  (And, honestly, this is one of those issues that crop up when only men are allowed to be theologians for so long.)

 

If you look around the world today, the cancer that seems to be infecting the world isn’t pride, as much as it is fear.  

 

It’s everywhere–Fear of immigrants, fear of refugees, fear of Muslims, fear of crime, fear of those people stealing our jobs, fear of not having enough, fear of those kids not pulling their weight, fear of…you name it–we’ve found a way to be afraid of it.  It’s fear.

 

This creeping insecurity surrounds us–and deludes us into turning our back on our relationship with God, and with each other.  This sort of paranoia convinces us that nothing can be trusted, that everything could be a danger, and that safety has to be our highest goal–instead of God.  

 

The story of the Passion is a series of fearful people, one after another.  

 

The Temple priests and leaders are scared–Jesus has been teaching and riling up the people for a while now.  The Temple hierarchy gets a certain (small) amount of power under Rome, so long as they keep their people in line.  Now, it looks like another charismatic preacher from Galilee is on the horizon, and about to trigger another revolution–one which will have a high body count among their people, and lead to their loss of power. So they move to stop Jesus, before any of that happens.  (FWIW–it doesn’t work.  A revolt, started by yet another charismatic Galilean figure starts 30 years later, and Jerusalem still burns.)

 

The Temple leaders hand him over to Pilate, arguing that Jesus is a threat to Rome, Jerusalem, and all of them!  They’re so afraid, they want Pilate to join them in their fear.    

 

And Pilate, he was afraid.  The Roman regime was threatened.  Every Passover pilgrims rushed the city to recall the LAST time God saved them from foreign oppressors.  The city was already on edge.  

 

And Pilate’s claim to fame was being ruthless with opposition.  His job was to keep the peace in Dodge however brutal he had to be.  And he so badly doesn’t want to make a decision, he passes the baton off to Herod.

 

And Herod–keeps power through pacifying Rome.  So he, too, doesn’t want to do anything–either to annoy Rome or his Jewish subjects.

 

Back to Pilate.  Who tries to get out of a decision, but to no avail.   Finally lets fear of crowd, of failure, of larger empire trump what he knows, and gives in.  (He’s not a hero here.)

 

And that’s not all–the disciples run away too.  

 

So a series of fearful people lead us to Golgatha under the blazing noonday sun on a hill outside the city, with crosses lining the horizon.

 

Fear is what separates us from the love of God.  Fear tells us we don’t have enough, we cannot share.  Fear tells us the Other is a threat.  That they are to be hated.  Fear tells us that to keep what we have we have to hoard and fight and scrimp and hide. That we aren’t enough, that all we have is ourselves.

Fear lies.  

 

Scripture tells us perfect love casts out fear.  And in this week, we see Love itself enter into the worst of our fears, and assure us that we aren’t alone.  We aren’t abandoned.  That there is nothing we fear that Christ cannot bear with us.  That in the love of Christ, none of our fears can truly separate us from the love of God.  

 

That in the end, God–Love itself, is stronger than Fear, stronger than Death, and on Easter morning, destroys the last of what there is to fear.  All we have to do is hold on til then.

 

Amen.

 

AJ Levine is my Shoe (and everything else) Heroine

I attended a preaching conference once with Amy-Jill Levine.  If you don’t know who she is, then I have the delightful task of introducing her to you.

She is a renowned New Testament scholar and author and also Jewish.  And teaches at Vanderbilt.  (Also–she has fabulous shoes.  Basically, she’s who I want to be when I grow up.)  That may sound weird to you, but if you’ve read anything she’s written, then you’ll see that she brings enormous value to the discussion of the Gospel texts.

She spoke to us about the pitfalls of preaching during Holy Week, and the many ways Christian preachers walk right into anti-semitism, mostly without realizing it.  Her lecture was so good, and so practical, that I refer to those notes every single year.

The Holy Week texts are loaded, and not just with religious angst.  They are also loaded because it was from these Passion narratives that generations of hatred sprang–and if we ignore that, then we give it tacit license to continue.  Unless we call out the history of the texts, unless we name the problems in them, then we allow this mess to continue.

It’s a tightrope.  Here’s my attempt from Maundy Thursday.

 

Rev. Megan L. Castellan

March 24, 2016

Maundy Thursday, Year C

 

There’s a common trope in Bible study–the God of the Old testament vs the God of Jesus.  The God in the Old Testament is violent, angry, and legalistic–always wanting sacrifice!  The God of Jesus is loving, inclusive and all about grace.  No violence, no sacrificing to be found.

There are numerous problems with this–aside from the fact that it’s way too simplistic.  (Protip: anytime anyone attempts to summarize something as complex as the Bible in the space of a tweet, ignore them.  They’re probably missing something.)  

This view, as well meaning as it is–because who doesn’t want to emphasize love and grace?, sets up the idea that Jewish people, since they follow that Old Testament God, are also violent, angry and legalistic…when all you have to do is think about this for a second to realize that this doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.   It also skips huge parts of the canon (if Jesus’ God is really all that loving and non-confrontational, what on earth is happening in Revelations, and where did the Left Behind series come from?)  And Marcion would be a big fan (yeah–Google it later.)  

So it’s a problem. And we need to be careful–especially at this time of year, because well-worn ideas like the OT God vs the NT God are often so familiar they creep in without our realizing it.  But Jesus’ God–the God he knew, loved, and preached, WAS the God of the Old Testament.  

God is God all the time.  God doesn’t change.  And God demands a lot, as it turns out.

The reading from Exodus sounds like that imaginary OT God talking.  Take a lamb, one without blemish, and eat it roasted.  Leave none of it for tomorrow–eat unleavened bread and bitter herbs.  Eat with your staff in your hand, your loins girded, your sandals on your feet…on and on.  For tonight I will strike down every firstborn in the land of Egypt–both human beings and animals.  This is the passover of the Lord.

It’s pretty brutal.  We aren’t used to much talk about sacrificing sheep, or smearing blood over things.  It’s ominous sounding–the vision of a last meal, eaten in darkness, as the Israelites secretly prepare to flee their slavery.   And the talk of the death of the first born is worse.  It just is.

So it’s tempting to hear Jesus’ talk about foot washing, about loving one another as a reprieve.  Oh hey!  No one’s killing cute baby animals!  All we have to do is be nice. Totally manageable.

Then we try it.

And people are sort of awful.  I mean, not all the time.  But a shockingly high amount of the time–people are hard to love.  

People can be different, they can be scary.  They can do things that challenge us. Sometimes we see them making bad decisions.   Sometimes they’re annoying or infuriating, or just hard to understand.  And sometimes they downright hurt us.–and so it feels  easier to dislike a lot of them, or hate them.  Or just ignore them altogether.  Because the truth is–people are just hard to love sometimes.  

The challenging thing about Jesus is, however, that Jesus doesn’t let us off that easily.  On the night before he died, Jesus told his followers to love one another as he loved them.  We have to love one another.  

The simplest, most impossible thing to do.

And being Jesus, he went farther than that–he demonstrated what that meant  He gave us bread and wine, and declared it to be his very self.  Here is my very body, he told his friends–given for you.  Want to know what love looks like?  This is it.  Do this in remembrance of me.

In the Eucharist, Jesus gives us his very self.  His body, his blood.  In bits of the most ordinary stuff imaginable.  So that we could have a tangible expression of Divine Love in this material ordinary things.  And so that we could learn to go and do likewise.  

When seen like that, really, that thing with the Exodus doesn’t seem that extreme.  All they had to do was sacrifice a sheep once a year.  Make a meal, and move on.  We are called upon to sacrifice our selves.  To give all we are and have to the healing of world.  Our resources, our skills, everything we have.  So that the world can have a glimpse of divine love in us.  

We are called to be the Eucharist for the world, gathered, blessed and given to the world around us.  We are called to pour ourselves out like wine for the life and wellbeing of the world.  The way the sheep made the people of Israel free–we are called to help make others free.  

And we are assured in Christ’s resurrection that as we do all this, we will be renewed in Christ’s life and love.  

Amen.

 

In which Megan gives a recounting of her activities

Hey, remember when I used to post things on this here blog?  Ah, good times!

Behold, I have not forgotten you!  I have just been swallowed up by lots of other things, which leave precious little time for blogging.

These things include:

  1. Writing for Lent Madness 2016 (I’m going to win one of these years.  Just not this one.)
  2. Writing for McSweeney’s.  (That sound you hear is my grandmother clutching her pearls in the Great Beyond.  Sorry, Naw Naw.)
  3. Writing a thingie for Trinity, Wall Street (not online yet)
  4. Writing a thingie for Church Publishing (not published yet)
  5. Working at diocesan summer camp in the Ozarks (my campers and I all developed the same heat rash.  So adorable.)
  6. Taking 3 vanfuls of teenagers to New York and Boston over two weeks (Those youth now know how to ride the NYC subway at rush hour like PROS.)
  7. Taking 3 vanfuls of teenagers around outreach sites in Kansas City over one week. (We struck fear and awe into the hearts of many a non-profit with our hard work.)
  8. Having Many Thoughts about the latest season of the Great British Baking Show. (Nadiya’s facial expressions are all of our facial expressions.)

Then, there was of course the normal round of preaching, pastoral care, troubleshooting the plumbing, diocesan crises, etc, that happens when you’re a priest in a parish.

Today, I’m 2 days past my eight-year anniversary of being a priest.  And while I could have predicted precious little of what my career has included, I am grateful for every single bit of it.  I pause to note here that initially, when I first considered this call, I hesitated because I thought being a priest would be ‘the easy route’ over being an actress.  God has been laughing pretty hard ever since.

Stay tuned for what will amount to a Sermon Dump over the next few days–wherein I post my backlog of sermons from the past few months.

The Theology of Crowd Control, and also the IRS

Donald Trump came to Kansas City on Saturday night.  My rector texted me and informed me that he was headed to the rally, to protest, and if he was thrown in jail, I had to come and visit him.  And also handle church the next morning.

The rallies in Chicago and Ohio have become increasingly violent; protestors have been beaten by rally attendees,.  Two days ago, the event in Chicago was cancelled entirely, and the two angry crowds came to blows in the streets.  I find a lot to be scary about Trump, but this is what I find most terrifying.  Even if he doesn’t win, even if most Americans listen to their better, calmer angels and vote another way–how do we put this violence that has been unleashed back in the bottle?

So I figured I should say something in a sermon.  Problem is, there are actually rules for things like this.  The IRS does not allow churches to either endorse candidates for public office, or to urge a vote against them.  (Please note:  this rule is interpreted pretty literally.  Which is why you see religious groups putting out voting guides all the time–“Those are on issues!  Not people!”–and why candidates for public office speak at religious institutions–“because they don’t ask for a vote, technically”.  I’m not arguing the rightness or wrongness of this law; I’m just stating it exists.)  All this is to say that I joked prior to the first service today that I really hoped I had threaded this needle carefully enough.  Otherwise, I would probably get some calls from a Trump lawyer, and wouldn’t that be fun to explain to the bishop?

Here’s what I said.

Rev. Megan L. Castellan

March 13, 2016

Lent 5

John 13

The NY Times had a story this week about how to explain this election to your children.  And while I assumed that this would be another usual hand-wringing that parenting articles can sometimes fall into–is peanut butter killing us all?  Which is better? Organic kale or organic quinoa?–turns out, this one had a point.

Think about it–really, imagine watching these Republican debates with a 7 year old kid.  Think of the interesting topics of conversation that would arise….See?  There are unexpected landmines in the educational process this year.  The Times interviewed all these teachers, who suggested that the candidates be used as object lessons in bad manners.  Or not playing well with others.  Or not saying things nicely enough.  

One teacher opined that children would be confused to see adults behaving in ways that they were explicitly told never to behave–no making fun of people who are different than you, no interrupting, no name calling, no threatening others with violence.  

But then, in the interests of balance, I guess, the Times found one guy who was a fan of one politician in particular, and whose 10 yr old son was as well.  “My guy does those things because he is bigger and stronger than the others, and he just wants to prove it.” The kid explained.  

Seems fair.  And if you watch the news, or the internets, or the social media, then there are a lot of voices insisting exactly that– that power lies in strength.  And more strength.  In hitting harder, in yelling louder, in hating more, and in having the best, biggest, and most expensive things ever.  And if you do that, then, congrats, because you’re the best leader of all of them.   And in our world right now, the path to greatness is found after you beat everyone else up. Or at least have them locked up somewhere.  Stronger is better.

So that makes arriving at church and hearing these readings all the more strange.  From Isaiah all the way to the gospel–even including Paul!  Paul, who lists out all the many ways that he is better than absolutely everyone else–he is a Roman citizen, he is Jewish, so better religiously.  He is a Pharisee, so better educated.  He even killed Christians, so better with lions, even, probably.  But, all of those ways in which he was stronger/better/greater he has come to see as loss, because that is how Jesus has taught him.  

And then, there’s this gospel story right?  Because there’s really nothing strong or macho about this story.  It’s downright embarrassing, in fact.

Jesus goes to the home of Mary and Martha , who are probably Jesus’ best friends.  Whenever we see them, they take care of him and feed him and the disciples–they feed them, they house them, they share hospitality.  And let’s face it, they’re way less idiotic than his actual disciples.  And now, in his last days, Mary does this outrageous thing and spends all the money, wastes all her money, to buy perfume to anoint his feet.  (Really.  All the money.  Nard was the most expensive stuff you could buy.)  

It’s extravagant, it’s costly, it’s sort of borderline gross, and kinda indecent.  She’s wiping his feet.  With her hair.  This is probably the most evocative image ever, precisely because PEOPLE DONT DO THIS.  It would have scandalized everyone in the room–this wasn’t the sort of thing that happened at a dinner party.  And it’s emotionally evocative too–because nard is used for funeral rites.  And Mary, Martha and Jesus have to confront the reality of his coming death.  It’s sad!  Mary and Jesus are both vulnerable here.  

 

There’s a parallel here between what Mary does, and what Jesus will do later, to wash the disciples’ feet.  That, too, is vulnerable, it’s slightly disgusting, and it’s messy–and will freak out most of the people in the room.  And both are acts designed to exemplify the service Jesus calls us to; the kind of life Jesus asks us to undertake.  

 

And, no, they don’t make a whole lot of sense.  Logic would be in the voice of Judas, who protests that it’s wasteful.  That the money could be better spent.  That this is pointless, and weak, and a better leader would be strong and tough and not allow this sort of nonsense from his followers.

 

Eh, he’s right.  But that’s not the point.  Judas, actually, is the guy who is usually right, but also usually missing the point.  Like here, sure–the money could be given to the poor.  But how rich, precisely, is Jesus in this moment?  How much money does Mary have?  No one in that room is anything other than poor.  So Judas’ protestation, and Jesus’ rebuttal, is not so much a prediction, as it is a description.  They’re poor.  They’re poor for the sake of the gospel.  They’re poor, because they, like Paul, have come to see all that the world counts as strength, as barriers to the love of God that they are called to share.  

 

The love that Christ calls us to is vulnerable.  And costly, and wasteful.  It involves risk and danger, and most of the time, looking foolish. We aren’t called to build walls, we aren’t called to be strong at all costs, we aren’t called to protect ourselves with jeering shouts at those we imagine are weak.  

 

I watched the Trump rally here in KC last night on TV last night.  And what I was most struck by was not his policies, not his verbal tics or even his hair–of course, he’s entitled to all these things.  What I was struck by was how he dealt with the crowd.  Every few minutes, protesters would erupt again, and interrupt Mr. Trump, and instead of calmly waiting, Mr. Trump began to taunt the crowd, saying that the way to deal with protesters, with people who disagree with you, is to arrest them.  “That’ll ruin their lives.  They’ll never do it again.”  Each time someone stood up to chant something, Trump gestured, and yelled for the person to be arrested.  “They’re bad people.  Just bad bad people.  We have to take America back from these people!”  And he stood onstage and proclaimed that he was a great Christian.  

Look–we can talk about his policy ideas all day.  We can talk about the ethics and the effectiveness of his suggestions regarding immigration and racial and ethnic profiling.  But it is patently unChristian and wrong to urge violence against human beings like this.  It is unloving to treat people who disagree with you like this.  It’s wrong.  It’s dangerous.  It’s irresponsible.

And most of all, it is not what Jesus calls us to.  Jesus teaches us that the truest power isn’t in the greatest display of strength, but in vulnerability.  In listening to others.  In serving others.  And in costly extravagance of love.  When we’ve knelt at the feet of another, as dirty and smelly as they are, and we still care for them.

That’s where we’re called to be.  Not heaping strength upon strength, building new walls for ourselves, but knelt at the feet of one another.  Like Mary.  Like Christ.  That’s where we should be.

Amen.